April 21

The Needle Moves: The Discovery of Electromagnetism

On April 21, 1820, a compass needle deflected during a lecture in Copenhagen, and the age of electricity began…

(Affiliate disclosure: Some links on this blog may earn us a small commission at no cost to you. Every bit helps keep the lantern lit.)

It happened in the middle of a lecture. Hans Christian Ørsted, professor of physics at the University of Copenhagen, was demonstrating the relationship between electricity, heat, and light—showing his students how a current passing through a thin platinum wire would cause it to glow. On the table beside the wire sat a small compass. And at some point on the evening of April 21, 1820, when Ørsted closed the circuit and current began to flow, the compass needle swung. It moved away from magnetic north. It pointed, not toward the earth's pole, but toward the wire.

Ørsted watched it. He noted it. He finished his lecture. Then, for the next three months, he thought about what he had seen—experimenting methodically, testing different wire configurations and current directions and materials, confirming what the twitching needle had suggested. When he reversed the current, the needle swung the other way. When he placed wood or glass between the wire and the compass, the effect persisted. The force was not blocked by ordinary matter. It went through things. It circled the wire in rings he couldn't see.

On July 21, 1820, he published his results in a short Latin pamphlet, Experimenta circa effectum conflictus electrici in acum magneticam—Experiments on the Effect of an Electric Conflict on the Magnetic Needle. Within a week, the French physicist André-Marie Ampère had read it, repeated the experiments, and begun composing the first of a series of mathematical treatises that would formalize Ørsted's discovery into law. Within a generation, Michael Faraday would demonstrate the reverse: that a changing magnetic field induces an electric current. Within half a century, James Clerk Maxwell would synthesize it all into four equations that described not only electromagnetism but the nature of light itself. The needle's twitch was the first domino in a chain that leads directly to every electric motor, every transformer, every radio wave, every screen you have ever looked at.

But here is the thing the textbooks usually omit: Ørsted was not surprised. He had been looking for exactly this.

The Philosopher Physicist

Ørsted was born in Rudkjøbing, Denmark, in 1777, the son of a pharmacist. He and his brother Anders — who would eventually become Prime Minister of Denmark—educated themselves largely at home, reading voraciously, before passing the university entrance examinations in Copenhagen with exceptional marks. Ørsted studied physics, philosophy, and pharmacy, and received his doctorate in 1801 for a thesis on Kant's Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science. He was, before anything else, a philosopher of nature.

The philosophy that shaped him was Naturphilosophie—a current of German Romantic thought associated above all with Friedrich Schelling, whose foundational text Ideen zu einer Philosophie der Natur (“Ideas for a Philosophy of Nature”) appeared in 1797, when Ørsted was twenty. Schelling's central claim was that nature is not a mechanism but an organism—that it is animated, dynamic, fundamentally unified. Mind and nature are not separate substances but two expressions of the same underlying reality. The system of nature, Schelling wrote, is the system of our mind. And the forces that manifest in nature—electricity, magnetism, heat, light, chemical affinity—are not independent phenomena but different faces of a single primordial force, the Weltseele, the World Soul.

This was not merely a metaphor for Schelling and those he influenced. It was a research program. If the forces of nature are unified, then any apparent separation between them is provisional. Somewhere, under the right conditions, electricity must produce magnetism. Magnetism must produce electricity. Heat must relate to light. The task of the natural philosopher was not to catalogue separate phenomena but to find the connections—to demonstrate, empirically, the unity that philosophy had already declared must exist.

Ørsted spent years writing about this. In 1803 he declared there was a “unity of all the forces” of heat, chemistry, electricity, and magnetism. In a 1812 German text, he wrote that “Chemistry will then become a science of forces; mathematics will reach into its inmost recesses.” He specifically discussed the possibility of converting electricity into magnetism as early as 1813, seven years before the compass needle moved. He had written himself right up to the threshold of the discovery—and then, in the middle of a lecture, he crossed it. He called the effect he observed a “conflict of electric forces”—a phrase that is pure Naturphilosophie, and borrowed directly from Schelling's language of polar opposition and dynamic tension.

He is sometimes said to have discovered electromagnetism by accident. However, what happened on April 21, 1820 was anything but an accident; it was the confirmation of a philosophical conviction made visible by a small compass on a lecture table.

What “Naturphilosophie” Actually Was

The Modern Occultist reader will recognize the structure of Naturphilosophie immediately, because it is the structure of the Hermetic tradition.

The great chain that runs from the Emerald Tablet's “As above so below,” through Neoplatonism, through the Renaissance natural magicians, through the alchemists, through Paracelsus and Agrippa and John Dee is precisely the conviction that nature is unified, animated, and intelligible—that its apparent diversity conceals a fundamental oneness, and that the task of the serious student is to find and work with that underlying unity.

Schelling's Naturphilosophie drew explicitly on Spinoza's identification of God and Nature—Deus sive Natura, “God or Nature,” the same substance viewed from two directions. Ørsted himself wrote, in his own words, that natural laws are “divine thoughts”—that studying nature was studying the revelations of a rational will that had inscribed itself in the structure of the physical world. He wrote of “the way from nature to God” as a genuine path. He was not speaking metaphorically. The compass needle and the voltaic pile were instruments of theology as much as physics. When he found the connection between electricity and magnetism, he experienced it, by his own account, as the discovery of a divine unity that he had philosophically known must be there.

This is the tradition that produced the discovery. Not the Newtonian tradition of separate forces and corpuscular mechanisms—in fact, the orthodox Newtonian view of the day predicted no connection between electricity and magnetism whatsoever, which is partly why other experimenters had missed the effect even when they had the equipment to observe it. They placed their compass needles at right angles to the wire, expecting any magnetic effect to be parallel, and saw nothing. Their preconceptions organized their observations into invisibility. Ørsted placed the compass parallel to the wire, expecting the perpendicular deflection that Naturphilosophie had told him to look for, and saw everything.

The history of science likes to tell itself as the story of careful empirical observation gradually defeating philosophical speculation. Ørsted's discovery of electromagnetism is a significant complication in that story. The philosophical speculation, in this case, was right. The speculative conviction that nature must be unified led a Danish professor to look for a connection that orthodox science denied existed—and to find it, in the middle of a lecture, with a compass and a wire and a voltaic pile made of twenty copper rectangles.

The Chain Progresses

The pamphlet Ørsted published on July 21, 1820 was circulated privately to physicists and scientific societies across Europe. The reaction was immediate and enormous. Ampère's mathematical treatment came within days. Faraday's demonstration of electromagnetic induction followed in 1831. Maxwell's equations arrived in 1873. Einstein's special theory of relativity—built on a question about the velocity of light that Maxwell's equations raised—came in 1905. The technological consequences are everything you see around you: generators, electric motors, transformers, radio, television, computers, the internet, every wireless signal passing through the walls of every building on earth right now.

All of it traces back to a compass needle deflecting in Copenhagen on the evening of April 21, 1820. Which traces back to a philosopher's conviction that the forces of nature are one. Which traces back, further still, to a very old idea—older than Schelling, older than the Romantics, older than Newton or Descartes or Galileo—that what appears to be many is, at its root, one. That the visible world is the expression of an invisible unity. That there is a correspondence between the structure of the mind and the structure of nature.

Ørsted himself had a phrase for the path from the compass needle to the divine principle he believed it expressed. He called it, simply, “the way from nature to God.”

He would have understood perfectly why it belongs in a magazine called Modern Occultist. He was one of us.

(Every day, Modern Occultist News will present "This Day in Occult History" and will dive into the birthdays, rituals, breakthroughs, and crucial moments that shaped today's many esoteric traditions. From the Hermetic revival to Witchcraft, from Crowley to cyberspace, we'll bring the best stories and latest trends to today's own modern occultists everywhere.)

Modern Occultist